Back Home About Us Contact Us
Town Charters
Seniors
Federal Budget
Ethics
Hall of Shame
Education
Unions
Binding Arbitration
State - Budget
Local - Budget
Prevailing Wage
Jobs
Health Care
Referendum
Eminent Domain
Group Homes
Consortium
TABOR
Editorials
Tax Talk
Press Releases
Find Representatives
Web Sites
Media
CT Taxpayer Groups
 
Binding Arbitration
Office of Legislative Research

 

 

Office of Legislative Research

 

February 28, 2005, 2005-R-0275

QUESTIONS FOR EDUCATION ARBITRATION PANEL NOMINEES

By: Soncia Coleman, Research Analyst

 

GENERAL QUESTIONS FOR ALL NOMINEES

1. Municipal officials, news media, and members of the public are often highly critical of the teacher binding arbitration law and of arbitrators’ decisions on particular contracts. How do such criticisms affect your decisions as an arbitrator?

2. The Teacher Negotiation Act (TNA) requires arbitrators to give priority to the public interest and the school district’s financial capability in deciding issues. Do these two factors ever conflict? How do you give priority to both?

3. Does the fact that voters in certain districts have repeatedly rejected local education budgets weigh in your consideration of a district’s financial capability?

4. What is your opinion of the “last-best-offer” system?

QUESTIONS FOR ARBITRATORS REPRESENTING PARTIES

1. You will be representing the interests of parties in arbitration decisions. How do you seek to influence the outcome?

2. Do you ever vote against the offer of the party whose interests you represent? In what type of situation would such a vote be justified?